Yes, folks, today we're going to read more stories from Judith Merril's alphabetical list of honorable mentions at the back of her 1960 volume Year's Best SF: 5th Annual Edition. We're still on the "B"s, and today we've got stories by Alfred Bester, Raymond Brossard and Fredric Brown. The Brown entry is a little odd and may not quite fit the supposed rules of this blog post or Merril's book, but we'll get to that after tackling Bester and Brossard.
"The Pi Man" by Alfred Bester (1959)
"The Pi Man" debuted in the 10th anniversary issue of F&SF alongside an installment of the serialized version of Starship Troopers and Theodore Sturgeon's "The Man Who Lost the Sea." For some reason, Merril cites not that magazine but a 1960 book publication of the tale in The Best from Fantasy and Science Fiction: Ninth Series. So I will dutifully read the story from a scan of that book rather than from the magazine, following Merril's advice to the letter!I haven't read anything by Bester during the period of this blog's tortured existence, though I read the famous The Stars My Destination in my New York days. Barry Malzberg wrote in 1976 that Bester was "The best stylist pound-for-pound (I'd make him a light heavyweight) in the history of this field," so Bester is probably one of those writers I should read more of; if I love "The Pi Man," maybe you'll see Bester's name a lot more here at MPorcius Fiction Log in the future.
Well, I'm afraid we are not making a love connection today. "The Pi Man" is a show-offy literary piece full of quotes and foreign phrases, sentence fragments and strange typography, present tense first-person narration and onomatopoeia; you can see why critics who are into modern literature like Merril and Malzberg would like it. The plot and themes of "The Pi Man" reminded me of Michael Moorcock's Eternal Champion stories, in which a guy is compelled to travel through time and space to fight in wars so that the forces of Law and Chaos remain in balance. Except Bester here is largely kidding and we get a happy ending instead of a tragic ending (maybe.)
The narrator of Bester's tale is driven by an obsessive dedication to symmetry and balance. For example, on his morning commute he reads the newspapers that he senses other subway riders are not reading. At the restaurant he senses a lot of people are eating sugar so he takes his coffee black. The story contains a multitude of gags like this. Sometimes our hero acts voluntarily based on his own senses, like with the newspapers and the coffee. Other times, otherworldly forces or an irresistible need compel him to do things he doesn't understand, doesn't want to do, in order to maintain some balance he isn't aware of--for example, he assaults an old man who works in an office, injures him and destroys his documents, his spectacles and his pens.
We readers grok the gimmick after four or five pages of this, but there are still 14 pages for us to machete our way through. Luckily, Bester enlivens most of these pages with some edgy material that may or may not directly relate to his plot or primary themes. Bester satirizes beatniks (they don't bathe, etc.) and suggests that women are sexually attracted to men who treat them poorly. There's actually a lot of sexually suggestive stuff in this story; e.g., beatnik men's beards are likened to pubic hair, the claim is made that Americans like "over-stuffed" women while Englishmen like "skinny" women, and there is even some implied homosexual activity. Then there's the violence, like the revelation that the narrator beat his own dog to death. This stuff is all played for laughs.
The narrator is caught by the FBI, partly because a woman is chasing him, a woman desperate to have sex with him, and her pursuit distracts him. Then we get several pages of the narrator explaining to the Feds this whole balance thing. As an agent of the balance, some kind of essential cog in the machine that is the universe, the narrator always escapes prosecution and imprisonment, but is always denied friendship and love. The FBI has to let him go, but the girl who has been chasing him refuses to leave his side, and as the story ends there is the possibility that the narrator's loneliness will be assuaged, at least for a little while.
A crazy story that at times is pretty difficult or annoying to read, though it gets less difficult as you proceed. We're going to call "The Pi Man" OK, though this feels like a cop out, seeing as it is the kind of story that will have some readers gushing over its ambition and zaniness and others yawning at its self-indulgence or gritting their teeth at the challenges it imposes. And I suppose people may find the sex and violence offensive.
You can find "The Pi Man" in several anthologies, including one of Richard Lupoff's books about stories that he feels should have won a Hugo (the short story Hugo for 1960 went to "Flowers for Algernon" by Daniel Keyes), and multiple Bester collections, including 1976's Star Light, Star Bright, for which, according to isfdb, it was revised.
Revised, eh? Did Bester take out some of that sex stuff I highlighted above? Were the references to beatniks and Englishmen's taste in women in the 1959 "The Pi Man" dated by 1976? My inquiring mind wanted to know! So I took a quick glance at a scan of Starlight, an omnibus that includes Star Light, Star Bright, and, sure enough, the 1976 version of the story is totally different, with no references to beatniks, England, or skinny women that I could find with my own bleary bespectacled 54-year-old eyes or with the internet archive's search function. In the intro to the story penned by Bester himself, the author confides that the original version was "rather crude." Bester, old boy, it was all that crude stuff that was keeping me awake! Now I am wondering if Lupoff included the '59 original or the '76 revision in his 1981 What If? Volume 2, but I can't find a scan of the thing. Maybe a trip to WonderBook is in order.
![]() |
| Woah, some real treasures today from Richard Powers. |
"Mr. Merman" by Raymond Brossard (1959) We all make mistakes. Every time I go back and look at some old blog post of mine I find a typo. Then there was the time I mixed up Greg Bear and Gregory Benford, or was it it Ben Bova? And of course, for a while there I thought Fantastic and Fantastic Universe were the same magazine, the way Analog and Astounding are the same magazine or the way you call Amazing Stories just Amazing most of the time. So when I tell you that on page 318 of the paperback edition of Year's Best SF: 5th Annual Edition, the story by Raymond Brossard that appeared in the July 1959 issue of Fantastic Universe is listed as "The Merman" when in fact the story in question is titled "Mr. Merman," I say it with love and sympathy, not derision or contempt.
Raymond Brossard only has this one story listed at isfdb or philsp.com. Apparently he was a painter from New Jersey, greatest state in the Union, and spent much of his career in Mexico. This story has never been reprinted, as far as I can tell.
"Mr. Merman" is a pretty conventional story with wish fulfillment and twist ending elements. It is well written, though, so it is too bad Brossard didn't write more. Hopefully he found his life as a painter satisfying.
Mr. Merman slips in the bathroom, hitting his head and falling into a full tub, unconscious. He wakes up aware of a superpower of which he has heretofore been ignorant--he can breathe underwater! Most of this story consists of Mr. Merman testing his abilities, then looting a sunken ship and quitting his job and living the high life on the cash he retrieved from the ocean floor, having sex with many different women. When funds begin to run short he decides to loot a ship sunk quite a bit deeper. Oops, the pressure down there is too much for him and he dies.
Well, not quite. He dies alright, but all this business of being able to breathe underwater and finding sunken treasure and having sex with a bunch of hot babes was the dream he had as he was dying, drowning in the bath tub. It's "Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge" all over again!
"Three" by Fredric Brown (1959, sort of)
"Three" appeared in Gent, a men's magazine that, like Playboy, included fiction by SF writers. (For example, the cover of the February 1959 issue of Gent bears the names of Margaret St. Clair and Henry Slesar.) I couldn't find a record of this story on isfdb, but a look at philsp.com solved the mystery--"Three" is a series of reprints, three stories that originally appeared in F&SF and Astounding. We've already read the two F&SF stories, "Millennium" and "Too Far." We'll read the third story, "The Weapon," in the issue of John W. Campbell, Jr.'s Astounding in which it debuted."The Weapon" by Fredric Brown (1951)
Dr. Graham is a top scientist with a son who is, as Brown puts it, "mentally arrested"--don't worry, I'm not going to trigger you with the "r-word" like I did in our last post. Harry, fifteen, has the mind of a four-year-old.A guy comes to visit Dr. Graham. Dr. Graham is working on a superweapon, and his visitor warns Graham that his work could end the human race. Graham, of course, has heard it all before and wants to dismiss this crank. The crank tricks Graham into leaving him alone with his (intellectually) 4-year-old son. (Add your Michael Jackson and Marion Zimmer Bradley jokes here.) The crank leaves, and Graham goes to Harry's room. He finds his visitor has left Harry with a loaded revolver. Brown ends his two-and-a-half-page story in italics:
...only a madman would give a loaded revolver to an idiot.
Groan. Brown takes a one-line piece of manipulative elitist bumper-sticker sophistry and expands it to two and a half pages. Thumbs down!
**********
Now is the time on Sprockets when we try to diagnose why Merril recommended these six stories. Merril is famous as the cheerleader of the New Wave, and Bester's "The Pi Man" is like a New Wave story with its many experimental modernist narrative techniques and its emphasis on sex, so that one is easy. Brossard's story is a little less explicable, but one of Merril's big life projects was to point out how the divisions between genre literature and mainstream literature were bogus, and "Mr. Merman," as the editor of Fantastic Universe Hans Stefan Santesson himself points out in his intro to the story, isn't really science fiction--it blurs or straddles the line Merril thinks isn't really there or at least shouldn't be there. Also, it is a decent story, so maybe she legitimately really liked it.
Then we have the three Brown stories. "Millennium" is a one-page story about a guy outwitting the Devil by making the Devil grant his wish that the general population be smarter and less evil; you could maybe interpret this story as exhibiting the kind of misanthropic elitism we expect of lefties like Merril. "Too Far" is another one-page "vinnie," one with edgy sexual content, so maybe also New Wavey? I'm guessing, however, that the main reason Merril liked "Three" was that its largest component, "The Weapon," is a story that tells you the American people are morons and so can't be trusted to have a defense against the Soviet Union.
A strange assortment today: a wild experimental piece that was radically rewritten a decade and a half after Merril promoted it; a competent one-off; and three short-shorts that actually were not new in 1959 but in fact reprints. One reason I pursue these Merril-oriented projects is that Merril's choices are full of surprises (sometimes surprises to me because my sensibilities are very different than hers) and today really has borne that out. Who knows what we will encounter the next time we take direction from Judith Merril? Stay tuned to find out.

































