"The Finest Hunter in the World" (1970)
This is a gimmicky joke story, but entertaining. A short fat dude is, somehow, the greatest hunter on Earth. He arrives on Venus in hopes of killing the notoriously deadly swamp-thing and becoming the greatest hunter on two worlds. The strapping six-foot two guy in Muckcity who greets the hunter resents the inequality between them. One of Harrison's little jokes is that Muckcity is so repulsive that the population is so small that this good-looking hunk has to be the town's hotel owner, sole journalist, mail carrier and swamp guide. The hunk thinks he should be rich and famous and this pudgy little hunter the loser, and hopes the swamp-thing will kill the hunter so he can steal anything of value from his bags.
The hunk and we readers soon (the story is only three pages long) learn a little something about the techniques that have made this less-than-impressive figure the finest hunter on Earth, techniques that leave both the nearest swamp-thing and the unscrupulous Muckcity hunk among the hunter's trophies.
Better than most three-page joke stories. It feels like a magazine filler story, and is better than a lot of magazine stories, but it seems that it debuted here. Asimov, Greenberg and Olander included "The Finest Hunter in the World" in Microcosmic Tales.
"Down to Earth" (1963)Here we have an Amazing cover story that would go on to be included in an issue of Urania with a typically awesome Karel Thole cover illo and a Dutch anthology with the image of a safety pin on its cover. Harrison himself must be happy with "Down to Earth;" it appears in three Harrison collections and when Harrison was credited with editing a 1968 issue of the magazine The Most Thrilling Science Fiction Ever Told it was this story that was included in its pages.
Unfortunately, I am not happy with "Down to Earth," a pedestrian parallel worlds/alternate history twist ending story that tries to camouflage the fact that it is a parallel worlds/alternate history story in a way that is an outrageous waste of time.
The story starts out great. It is 1971 and the first two Earthmen have landed on the moon. One of them falls in a hidden crevice and the other, Gino, tries to rescue him--but without success. Heartbroken, he returns alone to the orbiter piloted by the third member of the mission, Dan.
Dan and Gino return to Earth to find they are in an alternate universe in which World War II is still raging in 1971--the United States remained neutral back in the '30s and '40s and the Germans conquered Europe and they are now in the '70s making advances in both the USSR and the United States. There is some adventure stuff as our astronauts are captured by German soldiers and then rescued by American troops. This adventure stuff isn't exactly bad, but it is totally mundane, the sort of stuff we have already read innumerable times in our lives as people who read popular literature. (Harrison did a much better job early in the story, on the moon and in the orbiter, portraying scenes of danger and risk and the emotional toll suffered by Gino and Dan.)
Eventually our heroes meet Albert Einstein, who explains in an absolutely unconvincing way that they are not in an alternate universe or on a different timeline like they have read about in science fiction magazines; akshually, the astronauts are in the same "objective" world they always have been but in a different "subjective" one, their perceptions altered due to the psychological stress they suffered when their comrade died and from the experience of being out of sight of their home planet while on the far side of the moon. Harrison is wasting our time with this goofy explanation because it doesn't change one bit how the story itself operates--to get them back to the Earth you and I inhabit in which the Axis powers lost World War II, Einstein doesn't mess with the two men's psychologies or perceptions--he invents a box with a switch on it that has to be thrown at just the right moment in just the right physical location. The twist ending is that Einstein, Dan, or some unnamed somebody, goofs, and Dan and Gino find themselves in a third version of Earth, one in which the United States is a monarchy.
Maybe this is a joke story and I am not getting the joke? A spoof of what it appears to be?
"Down to Earth," even though it started out with stuff I love (space suits, danger on the moon, tragedy in space) is composed mainly of a bunch of stuff I almost never like, stuff that rubs me the wrong way. I try to avoid alternate history stories because they annoy me, maybe because I'm interested in actual history, studied history as an undergrad and in a doctoral program (which I dropped out of without a degree) and read actual history books and memoirs of World War II servicemen, and so don't seek that sort of material in SF. I've mentioned here on the blog a few times that I find Kennedy-worship annoying, and I also find the sort of FDR-worship and Einstein-worship that this story indulges in annoying. (What's most irritating about this sort of thing is that writers take for granted that the reader is a fellow worshipper, and don't introduce Roosevelt or Kennedy into a story with the idea of arguing a persuasive case for why they are so awesome--they just assume you agree they are awesome and lazily mention these idols to serve as a cheap source of emotional power for their stories.) So I've got my own peculiar hang-ups that make it hard for me to enjoy this story; I'm giving it a thumbs down, but maybe if you don't have my hang-ups, or maybe if you've never read an alternate history story before, you will like this story.
"Commando Raid" (1970)
Here we have another story that debuted in Prime Number. "Commando Raid" went on to be included in Joe Haldeman's oft-reprinted anthology Study War No More.Left: Are we seeing stars through the moon? Right: Is there really a sword and sorcery scenario to be found in this anthology? |
The only short story by Harry Harrison that impressed me was The Streets of Askelon.
ReplyDeleteMake Room! Make Room! is definitely worth reading. However, it's a consciously dishonest work in its extrapolations which is a problem for a propaganda piece. (Or, at least, so my memory tells me. I'd have to search for the cite for that opinion.)
ReplyDelete