Thursday, April 13, 2023

Merril-approved 1956 stories: Clingerman, Cogswell and Cohen

Here at MPorcius Fiction Log we are reading 1956 stories recommended by Judith Merril in the back of her 1957 anthology SF: The Year's Greatest Science-Fiction and Fantasy: Second Annual Volume, where you will find a long alphabetical list of "honorable mentions" that didn't quite make the cut for inclusion in Merril's book.  Today we finish up the "C"s with stories by three authors with whom I have very little familiarity: Mildred Clingerman, Theodore R. Cogswell, and Chester Cohen.  

This will be leg six on our Merril-guided journey through 1956.  Below find links to the earlier installments.   

            Abernathy and Aldiss
            Anderson, Allen and Banks 
            Barrow, Beaumont and Blish
            Bradbury, Bretnor, Budrys and Butler    
            Carter, Clarke and Clifton

"First Lesson" by Mildred Clingerman 

I regularly see Clingerman's name on issues of F&SF (I don't know if she was ever published in any other SF magazine, though her work did appear in mainstream periodicals like Good Housekeeping) but, when I read her joke story "Letters From Laura" in F&SF editor Anthony Boucher's A Treasury of Great Science Fiction, I wasn't impressed enough to seek out other work by her.  (I also had a vague intuition that Boucher was publishing her because he had a crush on her.)  But today, based on Merril's recommendation, let's today give Clingerman another chance.  

"First Lesson" is full of regional stuff and identity politics stuff: a hostile description of the American South presented in the voice of a woman who misses the deserts and the mountains of her native Arizona (Clingerman herself seems to have spent most of her life in Arizona;) a bitter description of relations between the wives of enlisted men and the wives of officers; sketched portraits of the volatile friendships that women have with each other; and a plot that relies on the idea we see in fiction all the time, that black people have special occult or spiritual knowledge that can be used to help or harm white people.  Various Southern accents are represented, but the "crisp consonants" of the residents of New Jersey--the land of my birth--also get a shout out.  (I guess I can provide 21st-century readers trigger warnings that the story features a "magic Negro" and represents African-American speech phonetically in a way that is maybe not flattering and African-American writing as being rife spelling errors.)  

America is at war.  Our narrator is the wife of an enlisted man in the paratroopers and they have moved into the tower room of a Queen Anne house in the Southern town near the base where he is being trained.  (In keeping with the story's horror plot and general tone of unease, the narrator considers the house very ugly, but I have to register my dissent here and say that I find Queen Anne houses delightful; I am quite satisfied with the current HQ of MPorcius Fiction Log, but for years and years I had little daydreams about setting  up my HQ in one of those Victorian towers.)  Every day hubby goes to the base to train, and every night the narrator has horribly vivid dreams of him dying in an accident.  She unburdens herself to the black maid, who offers to employ black magic to protect her husband for a fee of twenty bucks.  Sure enough, after the money is handed over an odd little rituals are performed, husband narrowly escapes death in an accident exactly like the one in the dream.  Clingerman's ending introduces a lot of ambiguity--she gives us multiple clues that the supernatural is real and supernatural phenomena are what saved the narrator's husband, but also has the black maid admit the rituals were all a goof.  I believe that the way Clingerman squares this circle is by rendering her story not a weird tale about how the universe is horrible and inexplicable, but a tale of Christian awakening: the narrator's husband was saved because the black maid prayed to God to spare him, and the narrator is telling us this story because it represents the first step of her journey from young cynical unbeliever to one who today embraces the Christian religion, thanks to the intercession of that African-American servant, a woman who, like all of us, may be a sinner but can do God's work.

This story is well-written and all the characters' behaviors and personalities ring true, and all the social class and regional stuff, though perhaps superfluous, is interesting and feels authentic.  A decent mainstream story with SF elements; probably a good story to read if you are studying the portrayal of black people, Christianity, and (nonsexual) relationships between women in SF.          

Merril loves to reprint and promote stories as SF that first appeared in mainstream venues, and before Anthony Boucher reprinted "First Lesson" in F&SF it made its debut in Collier's.  In 1960, Robert P. Mills included "First Lesson" in A Decade of Fantasy and Science Fiction, and you can also find it in the Clingerman collections A Cupful of Space (1961) and The Clingerman Files (2017.)   

"Impact With the Devil" by Theodore R. Cogswell

Here's another name I see when I'm looking at old magazines but haven't gone out of my way to read; this will be the first Cogswell story I have ever read.  Its title is making my spider-sense tingle like crazy--it seems likely it is one of those allegedly humorous deal-with-the-devil stories, but in pursuit of this Merril 1956 project I am reading it anyway.

"Impact with the Devil" debuted in F&SF, where, as a note from editor Anthony Boucher explains, it is one of three stories presented in this issue that each integrate three genre fiction cliches--the deal-with-the-devil story, the locked room mystery, and the time paradox story.  Isaac Asimov and Miriam Allen deFord also contribute stories to this quixotic project, which is the brainchild of Cogswell.

"Impact with the Devil" is a complicated sort of Rube Goldberg thing with various twists and surprises that are neither fun nor interesting.  In the future, a criminal whose henchman is in trouble tries to enlist the help of a scientist who has a time travel machine in getting his underling out of a jam.  We are lead to believe that the scientist is the Devil, but then the truth is revealed--the scientist is not the Devil, but the criminal and his offscreen henchman are rank and file devils.  The onscreen devil travels back in time but his scheme to help his subordinate is foiled by the laws governing time travel.  (You can't change history in a way another person might notice.)  When the devil tries to kill the scientist in a locked room and thus present the police with an insoluble locked room mystery, the scientist turns the tables on the devil--the scientist knows how to bend the rules governing time travel (you can change history if nobody notices) and uses this against the devil; besides, the scientist is an angel in disguise who is on Earth hunting down devils.  

A waste of time with no human feeling or intellectual interest, just a cold and complicated mechanism full of trickery, like a non-heliocentric orrery full of epicycles.  I guess Merril admired the way Cogswell conceived of and tackled the (to my mind profitless and academic) challenge of working three tired and boring cliches into one whopper of a gimmick story.  

"Impact with the Devil" would be reprinted in the Basil Davenport anthology Deals with the Devil and the Theodore Cogswell collection The Third Eye. 

"Round-Up Time" by Chester Cohen

Here we have a name I don't know if I ever saw before it came under my steely gaze in Merril's "Honorable Mention" list.  Cohen only has five fiction entries at isfdb, and this story has never been reprinted.

"Round-Up Time" is a lame filler story and I have no idea why Merril recommended it.  Like the Eric Frank Russell story we read recently, "Rhythm of the Rats," it is based on the story of the Pied Piper of Hamelin.  

Our narrator is a beggar who goes to Central Park in Manhattan to beg people for money.  He encounters a colorfully dressed guy, watches him attract a crowd of people by, apparently magically, summoning irresistible music.  The music sounds different to each person, but each listener finds it to be his favorite type of music, flawlessly performed.  The gaily attired music-maker hurries off and his rabid fans follow him into a space ship that hovers over the river; the ship leaves, carrying these New Yorkers to an unknowable fate.  The somewhat predictable surprise ending of the story is that the narrator is deaf--this is how he escaped capture.

Cohen includes in his story an analog of the lame child who appears in many of the Pied Piper stories and is not able to follow the Piper with the others.  An element of "Round-Up Time" that maybe is derived from some component of the tale of the Pied Piper that I don't remember, is that people who hear the Piper's music are eager to give money to the beggar.

I have to give this story a mild negative vote.  

**********

Clingerman's is obviously the best of this scurvy crew of "C"s, her story being the best written and the only one that has any real human feeling or hint of a point or an ideology; the Cogswell is a self-conscious stunt, the Cohen gimmicky derivative filler.  I am interested in authentic feeling and speculation, which Clingerman delivers (a woman worried about her husband, trapped away from home in a place she doesn't like, encountering other demographics and dealing with the supernatural) while the Cogswell and Cohen are just recursive or meta in-jokes--Clingerman's story is in dialogue with and a reflection of real life, while Cogswell's and Cohen's are just commentary on the practice of writing and other earlier writings (if I was being mean-spirited, I would call Cogswell's and Cohen's stories masturbatory and incestuous.)  

Stay tuned for more not-at-all mean-spirited commentary on fiction here at MPorcius Fiction Log.   

Monday, April 10, 2023

F&SF Feb. '57: Clarke, Brown, Anderson, Derleth and Wellman

Let's crack open the February 1957 issue of F&SF to finish up Arthur C. Clarke's 1956 collection of anecdotes about the human race's first trip to the Moon, as related by the captain of the British component of the joint US-UK-USSR expedition, "Venture to the Moon."  (We wrote about the first two anecdotes here, the second two here.)  While we have the issue in hand, might as well look at editor Anthony Boucher's book column (high praise for Charles Finney's The Circus of Dr. Lao and Robert Heinlein's Time for the Stars, commendations of Jack Vance's To Live Forever, Donald Wollheim's One Against the Moon, John W. Campbell Jr.'s "The Moon is Hell!" and Isaac Asimov's Lucky Starr and The Big Sun of Mercury, a middling review for Raymond F. Jones' The Secret People, and denunciations of Felix Morley's Gumption Island, Guy Richards' Two Rubles to Times Square and Martin Caidan's The Long Night) and read the issue's stories by Fredric Brown, August Derleth, Manly Wade Wellman and Poul Anderson. 

"Watch this Space" by Arthur C. Clarke (1956)

Alongside the hip of the woman in distress on the cover of this issue of F&SF, we see the legend "EVERY STORY in this issue NEW," but "Watch this Space," like all six of the "Venture to the Moon" stories, first appeared in The London Evening Standard.  Tricky, tricky....  

The lunar explorers conduct an experiment, projecting sodium into the thin atmosphere of the Moon during the night to see exactly how sunlight affects it as it rises out of the lunar shadow--it is expected to glow and from this glow various measurements can be made that will tell the eggheads things about the Moon and its atmosphere.  This is a highly-anticipated event because the glow should be visible from Earth.

The sodium (a few hundred kilograms) arrives from Earth in a device they call a "bomb" that volatilizes the sodium and then propels it skywards through a nozzle.  When the sodium rises into the sunlight the words "COCA COLA" appear--somebody on Earth clandestinely fashioned and installed into the nozzle a stencil and the windless thin atmosphere of the Moon did not disrupt the pattern as the gas rose.

(Isn't this reminiscent of a plot element of Robert Heinlein's "The Man Who Sold the Moon?")   

The final joke of the story is that the head of the American team is so embarrassed by this incident that he has to give up drinking delicious Coca-Cola and end his lifelong career as a teetotaler and start drinking beer, which he does not enjoy.

The Other Side of the Sky is one of multiple Clarke collection which reprinted 
"Venture to the Moon"

"A Question of Residence" by Arthur C. Clarke (1956)

The Soviet ship has failed, so the Soviet astronauts will have to return to Earth split up between the American and British ships.  Many of the explorers are eager to get home, and it has been decided that one ship can return a little earlier than the other, as a full complement of men is not needed to tidy things up now that all the experiments have been concluded.  But which will return to Earth first, the US or UK vessel?  All the astronauts have publishing contracts or deals with periodicals to produce accounts of their discoveries and adventures, and the British captain convinces the American captain to let the British crew stay on Luna longer; his persuasive argument is that they are only a few weeks away from living on the moon for a full six months, and if Britons are away from Blighty for over half a year they will face less income tax liability on what they make on their books and articles, seeing as they worked on them beyond the boundary of the United Kingdom.

Another pleasant if not laugh-out-loud funny joke based on human nature.

These "Venture to the Moon" stories have been light-hearted (but still science-filled) fun--thumbs up for all six!

"Expedition" by Fredric Brown (1957)

Back in 2018, when we were young, we learned that editor of F&SF Anthony Boucher considers Fredric Brown a master of the short-short, which they call the vignette or "the vinnie."  "Expedition" is just such a vinnie, less than two pages.

This is a lame joke story, as so many vinnies are.  Earth is starting a colony on Mars.  The first ship will carry thirty people, to be chosen by lot from among the graduates of the space academies--by a bizarre twist of luck, 29 women and only one man end up on the first ship.  When the second ship arrives on Mars, all 29 women have given birth--the sole male colonist impregnated all of them.  The joke is that the second ship arrived only nine months and two days after the first, so that guy must have had sex with all the women in a very short time span very soon after first meeting them (there being two space academies, one for men, the other for women.)

Thumbs down!

"Expedition" has been a big hit and has been reprinted many times in many languages, in various Brown collections as well as theme anthologies on math, sex and space pioneers.  


"The Dark Boy" by August Derleth (1957)

This is a decent story about people who are lonely, a story that has a hopeful sort of ending.

A young widow who is sad because she has no children comes to a small rural town to teach in the one room school house; the previous teacher left under somewhat strange circumstances, and by mysterious means has urged the widow to not take the job.  It turns out that a boy was killed in an accident on the school grounds a few years ago, and the previous teacher claimed to have seen the kid's ghost and was thus deemed crazy by the townspeople.  Our heroine also sees the ghost boy, and learns that the boy's father, a widower, regularly sees the ghost as well, which scares him--after all, if anybody finds out he is seeing a ghost they may say he is insane as well.  The new teacher reaches out to comfort the ghost and his father, and as the story ends I believe we are expected to understand that the new teacher and the widower (who has a living son as well as a ghost one) are going to build a happy family and relieve each other's loneliness as well as the loneliness of the ghost child.

Derleth has laid some clunkers on us, but this one is pretty well put together.  It appears a TV show was actually made out of "The Dark Boy," an episode of Rod Serling's Night Gallery that aired in 1971, the year of my birth.  It looks like Derleth died earlier in that year--it is too bad he didn't get to see this work of his broadcast on the small screen.  "The Dark Boy" has reappeared in several Derleth collections and two different anthologies helmed by Martin H. Greenberg.       

"Old Devlins Was A-Waiting" by Manly Wade Wellman (1957)

Alright, another story from a man associated with Weird Tales (as most of my readers will know, Derleth was a big supporter of Weird Tales whose work often appeared in its pages--one reason Derleth penned so many clunkers was that he hurriedly produced things to fill up space when Weird Tales was short and to sell to finance Arkham House, the famous but not really profitable publisher that was founded to keep the work of H. P. Lovecraft in print.)  "Old Devlins Was A-Waiting" is one of Wellman's numerous tales of John the Balladeer, a guy who travels around the South, his guitar always at his side, and would go on to be included in Wellman collections.

John comes to a small college and meets a female professor, Dr. Anda Lee McCoy, who is conducting research on ESP and the occult.  Dr. McCoy is a blue-eyed blonde beauty, and two men on campus are chasing her.  One is a Rixon Pengraft, a fat guy with expensive clothes who smokes a cigar; the other is Anderson Newlands, a veteran of the Korean war who has eye trouble because of a war injury.  Newlands has more ESP ability than any person Dr. McCoy has ever met.

McCoy has a theory that people with ESP can see into the past or future if the mood is right, and there is a lot of business with drawing a SATOR square on the floor, interpreting what the words in the square mean, and then having John play the music to a song that apparently refers to an ancestor of Newlands', Captain Anderson Hatfield, a soldier in the American Civil War and a leader of the famously feuding Hatfield clan.   John doesn't know many of the words to the song, but then Pengraft appears--it turns out this guy knows the words, and sings them with gusto because they slight Captain Hatfield--Newlands interrupts the singing because he fears that if the song is completed it will summon his dangerous ancestor!  But then Pengraft pisses Newlands off, putting him in a situation which he can't resolve himself (Pengraft has a gun and Newlands does not), so Newlands completes the spell and Captain Hatfield is summoned from the other side.  Hatfield humiliates Pengraft and makes sure Newlands can hook up with Dr. McCoy.  Wellman suggests that the cause of the famous Hatfield and McCoy feud was a Romeo and Juliet-style love match that Captain Hatfield himself obstructed, and that by assisting his descendent to marry a McCoy, Captain Hatfield is somehow redeeming himself.  

This story is well-written enough, the style and the pacing and all that, but I feel like the construction of the plot has some problems.  Are we supposed to admire a guy who summons a man of violence from the dead to solve his love triangle problem, and accept that a woman would find that sort of thing attractive?  I feel like summoning one of your dangerous undead relatives to defeat your enemies is something an evil wizard or devil-worshipping priest or a desperate naïf would do, and the story would sit better with me if Anda Lee McCoy and Anderson Newlands were morally ambiguous characters, but Wellman obviously wants us to see them as mature upstanding citizens and feel all warm inside because they are going to get married.  Rixon Pengraft is also a problem.  One might feel Wellman stacks the deck too much against this guy--I mean, he is fat, short, smokes a cigar, has expensive shoes, has a wacky snob last name and a first name that reminds you of Richard Nixon, and is portrayed as an over-the-top sneaky boastful coward.  And how does Pengraft know so much about that song, more than almost anybody else?  It is certainly a strange coincidence that he has rare knowledge that provides him a way to make fun of the very guy he is competing with for the hand of a woman.

Presumably Wellman wanted this to be a feel-good story about good people succeeding and evil people being punished, but the goody goods are too good and the baddie is too bad, while the plot device used by the heroes to defeat the villain is the sort of cheap and underhanded device a villain or an anti-hero would use, so the whole thing is not only too manipulative but also emotionally confused.  Merely acceptable.    

"Journeys End" by Poul Anderson (1957)

This is a well-regarded story that has been reprinted in anthologies many times by people like Damon Knight, Robert Silverberg (two different anthologies!), Robert Hoskins, J. Francis McComas and Marvin Kaye, as well as by Boucher for a "Best of" F&SF volume.  In his intro here in the magazine, Boucher complains that there have been too many telepathy stories in SF lately, but assures us this telepathy story by Anderson is fresh and "tender and tough-minded." 

The main character of "Journey's End" is a telepath, and Anderson's story is a pretty good "realistic" exploration of what life as a telepath in our society might be like, and also evidences what we might call Anderson's "right libertarianism"--a skepticism of governmental and religious authority, a belief that the United States is basically a good place, and a tolerance for pluralism and human foibles--as well as Anderson's sense that life and history are tragic.*  The telepath's powers manifested themselves during puberty, and he had to leave his father's house because Dad was a Christian fanatic and thought his son engaged in witchcraft.  The telepath is stressed out when too many people are nearby and their thoughts overwhelm him, so he lives in the country.  He is an adult now, a successful writer.  A few years ago while on a moving train he sensed there was a telepathic woman on a train travelling the other way; this has been his only encounter with a fellow telepath, and he feels this is the only woman he could ever love, and has been seeking her ever since.  The telepath figures if they become parents their kids will also be telepaths, and their grandchildren as well, and that they can found a race of telepaths that, because of their empathy, will be able to steer society into a utopia of peace.

At the end of this story, which is mostly devoted to the telepath's biography and describing the experience of being a telepath, he finally finds the woman, and we get our sad twist--after looking into each other's minds each is repelled by the other, not perhaps by knowledge of the other's faults and sins, but rather because he/she can't bear the knowledge that the other is fully apprised of his/her own shortcomings, this consciousness making it impossible for them to forget or ignore their own regrettable thoughts and actions.  Ironically, the main character, whom Anderson has depicted as able to forgive and tolerate other people's faults, is crippled by his inability to forgive his own.

Pretty good.  I feel like I've seen this plot before, and a look around the blog reveals that Ed Bryant's 1970 story "In the Silent World," which I read back in 2018, has a quite similar plot. 

*I will note here that, in his intro to "Journey's End" in his 1971 anthology Mind to Mind, Robert Silverberg characterizes Anderson's work as essentially optimistic and believes this story is an exception, so my "take" on Anderson, that he has a tragic sense of life and history, is apparently not unanimous.   

**********

On the whole, not a bad batch of stories, only the very short Brown piece being truly reprehensible. 

More 1950s short SF stories in the next exciting episode of MPorcius Fiction Log.   

Wednesday, April 5, 2023

F&SF Jan. '57: Arthur C. Clarke & Poul Anderson

In the last episode of MPorcius Fiction Log we read the first two stories of Arthur C. Clarke's series "Venture to the Moon" in the December 1956 issue of F&SF.  I decided to check out the rest of the series while the first two were still fresh in my mind, so I rustled up the January 1957 number of F&SF, in which the third and fourth components of "Venture to the Moon" appear.  While I had that issue on the screen I figured I'd read the included Poul Anderson story, "Operation Salamander," and Anthony Boucher's book review column (Boucher loves Evan Hunter's novel Tomorrow's World, dismisses Margaret St. Clair's The Green Queen and Joseph E. Kelleam's Overlords from Space, suggests Donald A. Wolheim is not as good an anthologist as Groff Conklin or Judith Merril, and calls Robert Heinlein's "Year of the Jackpot" and Clarke's "Rescue Party" "excellent," Edmond Hamilton's "At the World's Dusk" "interesting if dated," and Amelia Reynolds Long's "Omega" "unspeakable.")

"Green Fingers" by Arthur C. Clarke (1956)

Here we have the third of the "Venture to the Moon" stories, which were first published in 1956 in a British newspaper and went on to appear in many Clarke collections.  I noted yesterday that the first two stories in the series were light and pleasant, but this one describes a sort of romantic tragedy!

A genius botanist has been brought by the Soviet ship to Luna.  He regularly takes the risk of leaving the Soviet base alone to traverse the surface of the Moon (the American and British teams have a strict rule against being alone outside their bases, but it seems the Bolshies are short staffed or something) so nobody knows what he is up to out there.  One day he fails to return, and when the narrator (the commander of the British team) and his comrades find him the botanist is dead.  It turns out that he has secretly bred a plant that can survive on the surface of the moon!  Because there are no wind or animals on Luna this botanist designed his plants to explosively propel their seeds away from themselves.  Well, one of the plants has grown to maturity and it expelled a seed that penetrated the botanist's helmet and killed him!

"All That Glitters" by Arthur C. Clarke (1956)

This fourth "Venture to the Moon" story is about a wacky coincidence and expresses a jocularly cynical view of (hetero)sexual relations.  The geophysicist on the American team has a wife back on Earth who loves diamonds, but her husband doesn't make enough money to buy the diamonds she covets.  (Clarke includes jokes about how some of the men on the Moon, a quarter of a million miles from their spouses, are happier than they have ever been.)  Over the years, this geophysicist became a sort of expert on the science of diamonds.  On the moon, collecting samples at a volcanic site, he discovers a huge diamond.  That very same day he gets a message from Earth--his assistants have successfully concluded his secret project of synthesizing diamonds!  The joke is that the diamonds on the moon have now lost most of their value, and we are told that the geophysicist's wife eventually divorces him.

These "Venture to the Moon" vignettes are entertaining little pieces of hard SF--thumbs up for both!

"Operation Salamander" by Poul Anderson (1957)    

In his intro to this tale of twenty-three pages, editor of F&SF Boucher tells us it is a sequel to "Operation Afreet" and is story about a "magic world of fantasy with all the stern logical rigor of science fiction."  "Operation Salamander" would be integrated with three other stories to make up the 1971 novel Operation Chaos and would appear on its own in a 1984 anthology of stories about witches and the third volume of The Collected Short Works of Poul Anderson in 2010. 

I groaned when I realized this was a joke story full of puns set in an alternate 20th-century America in which werewolves go to college and Ford and Chevrolet manufacture flying broomsticks.  Our narrator is a werewolf Hollywood actor who served in a recent war and is attending college on the GI Bill because he aspires to be part of the space program.  He and a witch are in love but she is on the faculty and there is a geas that prevents teachers and students from dating.

At a football game the cheerleaders are using a fire elemental--the salamander of the title--as part of the half time show fireworks, when a practical joker sets the salamander free and it starts setting the town on fire.  The narrator and his witch girlfriend join the effort to dispel the rampaging fire elemental, and this fight takes up most of the text.  Afterwards the witch gets the rule against students and faculty having relationships lifted and we are to believe that the narrator and she live happily ever after.

I can't take this sort of thing.  Thumbs down!


**********

The Clarke stories we read today feel authentic--they really sound like what you'd expect a guy who had been to the moon to sound like, they really transport you to the surface of the moon, and their tragedy and humor are based on human nature we can recognize and on science that doesn't short circuit our ability to suspend disbelief.  In contrast, Poul Anderson's story is like a lame Mad Magazine strip full of puns (somebody actually says "up Uranus") and Flintstones-style sight gags (broomsticks standing in for cars.)    

I'm not going to be reading any more of Anderson's "Operation Chaos" stories, but I will certainly read the rest of Clarke's "Venture to the Moon" stories.  Stay tuned!

Tuesday, April 4, 2023

Merril-approved 1956 stories: Carter, Clarke and Clifton

Here at MPoricus Fiction Log we are picking out stories to read from the list of Honorable Mentions at the end of Judith Merril's 1957 anthology of 1956 SF stories, the second of her famous anthology series.  (Get your copy at Wonder Book!)  Our enterprise is full of surprises, in part because Merril, always trying to expand the definition of what SF is and always concerned about the public perception of SF, doesn't just do the obvious thing and pluck good science fiction and fantasy stories from genre magazines like F&SF and Astounding and Galaxy--she also mixes things up by recommending bad stories from literary journals like The Hudson Review, as we saw last time.  I'm not (exactly) complaining--in the same way Telengard wouldn't be the same if there wasn't a chance of getting burnt to a crisp by a level 17 dragon before you can even touch a key, and spending the day going to Washington, D.C. museums and bookstores wouldn't be the same if you weren't likely to be harassed by an army of insane beggars while you were trying to savor your braised lamb at Cava, part of the excitement of reading a batch of these Merril-approved stories is the chance of having to endure some inexplicable piece of junk.  There is no adventure without risk!

This will be the fifth installment of this endeavor; today we start reading stories by "C" authors--four stories which all appeared in reputable SF magazines.  Below find links to the "A"s and the "B"s.

            Abernathy and Aldiss
            Anderson, Allen and Banks 
            Barrow, Beaumont and Blish

"Unbalanced Equation" by Paul A. Carter

Let's start with a story from an issue of F&SF we've already looked at recently, when we read Robert Abernathy's "The Year 2000" (link above.)  Paul A. Carter has like a dozen fiction credits at isfdb, and also wrote a history of SF magazines.  I don't believe I have read anything by him before, so today MPorcius Fiction Log blazes new territory.

Paul A. Carter was a college professor, one of the cognitive elite, and "Unbalanced Equation" is about how in their role as the maintainers of order the cognitive elite sometimes have to trick, manipulate and lie to the common people.  

Nuclear war wipes out the human race on Earth and the communist moon base--but the American moon base survives!  Finally some good news!  The entire human species now consists of like 2,500 people--and only 130 of them are women!  About 110 of them quickly get married, but that leaves 2,400 young men with nobody to marry, nobody to have sex with!  Carter's story is mostly about how the General commanding these 2,500 people tries to maintain order so the human race can endure.

The US moon base was home to a Mars colonization project that was almost ready to go when the war broke out, so the 2,500 blast off for Mars, where, in this story, people can breathe the air (with the help of compressors) and eat the native flora and fauna.  The survivors of the war quickly start building a colony, but it is obvious that the imbalance between men and women is going to cause chaos, with men fighting over the tiny number of women and women betraying their husbands when they get sick of them and so forth.  The number of married couples is so small, every single couple must be protected, must be given every chance to produce as many children as possible!  So, the General comes up with the idea of leaving the married couples at the landing site and splitting the unmarried men and women into four exploratory expeditions.  Some scouts from one of these columns have the delusion they have seen a beautiful woman in the distance; the general encourages the men to believe the sighting legit, and has them search for native women with the idea that if the men have hope they won't devolve into a crazy mass of suicidal or murderous maniacs and spoil any hope for humankind's enduring survival.  There is also the, somewhat obliquely presented, idea that the handful of unmarried women will be promiscuous and sexually satisfy the men of the four exploratory columns. 

(I think maybe the illustration on the cover of the magazine depicts the sighting of the hallucination.)

Even though "Unbalanced Equation" takes for granted the value of the traditional heterosexual family and seems to celebrate women acting as prostitutes to save humanity, it has feminist elements--the Earth women are not foolish enough to believe there are native women on Mars and a woman saves the General from death during a monster attack.

This story is OK.  It looks like other editors didn't like it as much as Merril did--after appearing in the French version of F&SF, it has never been reprinted (according to isfdb.)    

"The Starting Line" by Arthur C. Clarke

Alright, something by one of the "Big Three" classic SF writers.  On Merril's list under Clarke's name appears "'Venture to the Moon,' F&SF 12/56."  A look at isfdb and wikipedia indicate that "Venture to the Moon" is actually a series of six stories that first saw print in The London Evening Standard.  F&SF in 1956 published two of them, "The Starting Line," the first, and "Robin Hood, F. R. S.," the second.  We'll read those two today; if they are good maybe someday I'll track down and read the rest.  But be forewarned: while F&SF editor Anthony Boucher and Judith Merril seem to have liked them, Damon Knight, the hard ass who lost a job because he insisted on telling the truth about how much Merril's novel The Tomorrow People sucked, thought the "Venture to the Moon" stories (reports wikipedia) "remarkably trivial."     
      
I think of Clarke as a pretty optimistic guy, and "The Starting Line" is a cheery optimistic little story.  Not only are the United States and the Soviet Union working together on the project of travelling to the moon, but they have included the United Kingdom as an equal partner in the endeavor!  Each nation has a spaceship orbiting Earth; our narrator is the commander of the British ship, and he tells us he is bosom chums with both the other captains.  When he gets the word from the British government that on D-Day he should jump the gun so that Great Britain will have the immortal honor of putting the first man on the moon, he is appalled, but goes through with it anyway.  The very predictable twist ending is that the god-damned commies and the irrepressible Yanks have gotten the same orders from the Kremlin and Washington, so all three captains fire their rockets early and the three ships land on Luna within a second of each other.  (You see kids, we in the West are just like the Soviet Union!)       

Slight, even silly, but well-written and pleasant if you can look past the way the USSR is regarded as morally equivalent to the US and UK (something Merril presumably had no trouble doing.)  Boucher included the "Venture to the Moon" stories in the seventh "Best of" anthology of F&SF stories, and they would also be reprinted in numerous Clarke collections.  There's a market for these light feel-good stories.


"Robin Hood, F. R. S." by Arthur C. Clarke

The second of the "Venture to the Moon" stories is a traditional hard SF story about astronauts facing a problem and solving it through application of reason and science knowledge.  A load of supplies from an unmanned supply rocket ends up atop a difficult to scale cliff, and the boffins figure out how to get the supplies down by shooting arrows, taking advantage of the low lunar gravity.  The story's main joke is that after this caper that locale on Luna is named "Sherwood Forest."  Another of the story's benign little jokes is a reflection of how Americans are rich and have the most elaborate equipment--a common observation of British people exposed to Americans during WW2.  

A pleasant little thing.


"Clerical Error" by Mark Clifton

The final Merril Honorable Mention we'll be reading today is Mark Clifton's "Clerical Error."  In Merril's SF: The Year's Greatest Science-Fiction and Fantasy: Second Annual Volume, "Clerical Error" is listed as debuting in T. E. Dikty's The Best Science Fiction Stories and Novels: 1956, but when you look at that anthology (a scan of which is available at the internet archive) you see it says the story originally appeared in Astounding.  Odd.  In case the story was revised for inclusion in Dikty's book, I will note that I am reading the story in a scan of the February 1956 Astounding.  (I don't know if I have read any Clifton before--more virgin territory falls within the experience of MPorcius Fiction Log!)

"Clerical Error" is a story about the value of skepticism, freedom of speech, open-mindedness, thinking outside the box, and not being a yes-man.  

America is deep in a dangerous cold war, and scientists are needed to develop the latest technologies so we can prevail in the twilight struggle!  But many of our young scientists are suffering nervous breakdowns!  Dr. K. Heidrich Kingston is a Division Administrator at a government psychiatric hospital, and one such case, that of David Storm, comes to his attention when Dr. Ernest Moss requests permission to lobotomize Storm.  Kingston is skeptical of lobotomy, and doesn't just let the headshrinkers under his authority lobotomize people with reckless abandon as they would like to--our hero insists on specifically reviewing all such procedures before authorizing them.  Moss is one of these jokers who loves lobotomizing peeps, and has set Kingston a trap.  Storm knows all kinds of classified information, so only people with a top security clearance can talk to him; Moss, as a yes-man, has such a clearance--he is in fact head of the wing that treats men who are working on top secret projects and have gone off their rockers--but Kingston, a free thinker who gives off strong Thomas Szasz vibes*, isn't considered reliable enough by the establishment to receive a top security clearance, so he can't talk to Storm, and so can't really examine him to determine if a lobotomy is warranted or not.

Kingston is a true man of science--he loves learning!  He was content to be a small-time psychiatrist, but his nurse/secretary, Miss Verity (always with the evocative names!), whom he hired twenty-five years ago, is an ambitious and detail-minded woman, and has guided Kingston's career to its current pinnacle.  Kingston thinks too many of America's scientists don't have the skepticism that is the true essence of science; many of them went into science only because it is a cushy job with decent pay and some prestige, not because of a passion to increase the human store of knowledge, and these careerists are yes-men more interested in not rocking the boat and winning promotions than in pursuing the truth.  The government encourages the prominence of this personality type among the scientists working on our defense by only giving security clearances to the most loyal and predictable men--nobody with new ideas who questions dogma and resists authority can get a security clearance.  As a result, American scientific development is stagnating, producing no new ideas. 

Kingston figures out that Storm lost his mind ("withdrew from reality") because he began to suspect some truth that went against the settled science and his rigid mind--trained to obey superiors and utter no dissent lest he jeopardize his career--couldn't handle it.  Through clever manipulation of paperwork and personnel assignment, Kingston gets himself labelled insane and put in the same cell with Storm!  By talking to Storm he discovers what cognitive dissonance it was that drove Storm insane--the awareness that the scientific method and the regime of rigid obedience to rules were in conflict--and Kingston cures him.  Maybe this success presages a successful effort to loosen the rules and change the culture of the American science establishment in such a way that the free world's scientists will enjoy greater dynamism and productivity and give us an edge over the Reds!  

This is a good science fiction story in the classic mold that romanticizes science as a crusading, pioneering enterprise and the scientist as the heroic individual and denounces sclerotic bureaucracy and collectivist groupthink.  I liked that it suggested that most scientists are just ordinary people subject to ordinary selfish go-along-to-get-along biases and pressures and that it subtly warned us that we should take care that the pressures of the struggle against tyrannical collectivists not lead us to emulate those collectivist tyrannies.  While I am primarily seeing it as an attack on government, bureaucracy and the psychological establishment, lefties can embrace the story as an attack on McCarthyism and 1950s conformity.  (But, look out, feminists--Kingston--and I guess Clifton!--has some theories about women's attitudes about men and society that you are not going to like!) 

Thumbs up!  T. E. Dikty, Judith Merril and I all like "Clerical Error," but perhaps its biggest booster is our hero Barry Malzberg, who says in the intro to the story in Neglected Visions that "Clerical Error" is a masterpiece, Mark Clifton is "the most unjustly forgotten of all science fiction writers" and that he (Malzberg) had the idea to put out Neglected Visions primarily to serve as a way to get Clifton back on SF readers' radar.  Malzberg also suggests that "Clerical Error"'s attack on yes-men and leaders who demand obedience and rigid conformity is also a subtle dig at Clifton's editor, John W. Campbell, Jr., who famously guided his writers' output and put the stamp of his own personality on Astounding.     

*Speaking of her difficulty in getting Kingston a top security clearance, Miss Verity says "you've made public statements questioning the basic foundations upon which modern psychology is built.  You've questioned the value of considering everyone who doesn't blend in with the average norm as being aberrated."      

We here at MPorcius Fiction Log have blogged about several stories that appear in Dikty's
volume: Young's "Jungle Doctor," de Camp's "Judgment Day," Smith's "The Game of Rat and Dragon,"
Robinson's "Dream Street," Bloch's "I Do Not Love Thee, Dr. Fell," Scortia's "Shores of Night," and
Godwin's "You Created Us."

**********

I can't fault Merril on any of these choices.  The Clarke stories and the Clifton piece achieve their goals and are quite entertaining, and the Carter story, while not brilliant, addresses a provocative topic more or less successfully.  Lots of science in these stories, lots of Cold War material, and two of them have lots of gender stuff--definitely worth checking out if those are your interests.

More 1950s excitement awaits in the next episode of MPorcius Fiction Log!

Sunday, April 2, 2023

Merril-approved 1956 stories: Bradbury, Bretnor, Budrys, and Butler

After putting up a blog post that discusses three of a Nobel-prize-winning American writer's short stories (and engages in some drive-by art criticism), let's return to one of our more conventional operations, reading selected short stories from a list of honorable mentions that Judith Merril, a woman adored by aficionados of the New Wave, put at the end of her 1957 anthology SF: The Year's Greatest Science-Fiction and Fantasy: Second Annual Volume.  This will be the fourth installment of this project, finishing up the "B"s of Merril's alphabetical list.  One "B" who interests us is Robert Bloch, and Merril included among the ranks of her honorable mentions the Chicago-born Psycho scribe's "I Like Blondes," a Playboy story we've already read and which I called "barely acceptable" when I wrote about it last year.  Today we'll be reading four entries on Merril's list by "B"s who interest us which we haven't read yet, stories penned by Ray Bradbury, Reginald Bretnor, Algis Budrys and Frank Butler.   

            Links to earlier episodes of this series:
            Abernathy and Aldiss
            Anderson, Allen and Banks 
            Barrow, Beaumont and Blish

"Next Stop: The Stars" AKA "The End of the Beginning" by Ray Bradbury

After its debut appearance in MacLean's ("Canada's Magazine"), this story was retitled "The End of the Beginning" for reprinting in multiple Bradbury collections, including A Medicine for Melancholy, R is for Rocket, and Twice Twenty-Two.  Mary Kornbluth included it in her anthology Science Fiction Showcase and Gregory Benford and George Zebrowski included it in their Skylife: Space Habitats in Story and Science.  I am reading it in a scan of a 1980s paperback edition of R is for Rocket available at the internet archive. 

This is a brief romantic and sentimental story that repeatedly references the African-American religious song "Ezekiel Saw the Wheel," likening the wheel seen by Ezekiel to the first space station.  A man and his wife watch the sky to see the rocket manned by their son, Earth's first astronaut, take off to build that station.  Before and after watching this historic and very personal (to him) event, the father mows the lawn--the lawnmower is another example of a wheel.

In addition to all the emotional stuff about the couple worrying and holding hands and jumping out of their seats when they see the rocket blast off, and the references to the "Negro spiritual" and the Bible, the story is characterized by Bradbury's idea that if Man can colonize other planets he will achieve a sort of immortality (after all, if all of us are stuck here on Earth we are only one gain-of-function mishap away from total extinction.)

This story is fine, but obviously lacks today the power it must have had before actual space stations had been built.


"The Past and Its Dead People" by Reginald Bretnor

I believe I've read three Bretnor stories, "All the Tea in China," "The Man on Top," and "The Doorstop," in the past, and all three because Merril recommended them.  Merril is a Reginald Bretnor superfan--in her intro to "The Doorstop" she declared that "The Past and Its Dead People" "was to my mind the finest single story to appear in any science-fantasy magazine during the year [1956]."  Wow!  Merril seems to be the story's biggest booster, as after it appeared in F&SF, and the French edition of F&SF, the only editor who saw fit to reprint it (according to isfdb) was Miriam Allen deFord in her anthology Space, Time and Crime.  Well, let's see if we can join Merril on Team Bretnor.

"The Past and Its Dead People" turns out to be a pretty conventional story on a pretty conventional subject--small town women who are nosy, small-minded and judgmental gossips!  At 20 pages it feels sort of long and tedious--the metaphors and other literary flourishes add more to the length than to the atmosphere--as well as bland and cold--I feel like the main character could have been engaging, she being a woman driven by a passion and full of strong emotions, but Bretnor describes her as if from a distance, so we don't feel her excitement and aren't infected with her drive, don't hope or fear she will succeed.

The setting of Bretnor's story is one of those boarding houses we see so often in older fiction where a bunch of strangers live under one roof and eat together and watch TV together.  One tenant is the widow Emily Molbert, who apparently has limited psychic powers that don't allow her to read minds or see through walls or anything really impressive like that, but do help her figure out things.  Molbert likes to manipulate other people and demonstrate superiority over them, enjoys their envy of her, their fear of her, and their efforts to get her on their side.

A new guy, an older man named Dr. Flitter, comes to live in the boarding house and hang out with the crew, eating in the dining room with them and watching TV in the parlor with them every evening.  Quiet and reserved, retired from medical practice and returned to America after a period of residence in Australia, everybody is curious about this guy, and Molbert senses he has some kind of dark past.  Efforts to learn more about him achieve little until one day the landlady connives to give Molbert a chance to search his room.  Molbert learns (I think) that Flitter euthanized a child, a relative of his, and is broken hearted over it.  Backstabbing the landlady, Molbert doesn't share this blockbuster piece of gossip with the landlady, instead keeping it to herself and relishing the fact that she has a secret everybody else in the house is either trying to keep (the Doc) or is in agony to know (everybody else.)  Molbert shows off her knowledge in clever, subtle, plausibly deniable ways, and, eventually, uses her knowledge to manipulate Flitter into dramatically commiting suicide.

"The Past and Its Dead People" is competent, so I'll grade it "acceptable," but I am curious why Merril thought it was so awesome--the best of the hundreds that appeared in 1956 SF magazines!  Maybe the way it portrayed Americans as a bunch of small-minded hypocritically-moralistic status-seeking jerks appealed to her leftist sensibilities?  Personally, I suspect the story could more easily be interpreted as a piece of misogyny, a portrayal of women as cruel, even sadistic, liars who employ guile to manipulate men and each other, and not necessarily out of concrete rational interest (for money, say) or for feminist reasons (like to get "Burning Bed" revenge on wife beaters or to undermine the patriarchy) but just for their own sick twisted pleasure.

Maybe it was Bretnor's treatment of euthanasia that appealed to Merril--the story implicitly or obliquely argues that euthanasia can be commendable, and skepticism of it is misguided, perhaps even bigoted.    SF writers often question social taboos, like the taboos on incest and public nudity, and many argue that scientific experts should have a larger role in running society, so it wouldn't be that surprising to learn Merrril, a leftist SF writer, thought there should be more leeway for doctors--members of the cognitive elite--to kill people for their own good.

Finally, it is of course significant that the piece Merril thought the top story of 1956 is only barely describable as SF, its plot relying not at all on psychic powers (Bretnor could have just had Molbert figure out what Flitter did by discovering a diary or a letter or something mundane like that without changing the story's plot and themes a whit)--Merril famously thought the boundaries between SF and mainstream literature were bogus and sought to include in her famous anthologies stories by mainstream writers and from mainstream publications.  But I can't endorse her assessment--this story is pretty average, not much more than filler.     
      

"With a Dime on Top of It" by Algis Budrys

Merril includes Budrys's "Silent Brother" in her anthology of 1956's "greatest" SF tales (I liked it when I read it in 2019) and lists three Budrys stories under the Honorable Mention heading: "Peasant Girl" (which also garnered praise from the MPorcius staff in 2019.) "The Mechanical Man" (this one I judged "acceptable") and "With a Dime on Top of It," which I read today.

"With a Dime on Top of It" is a psychological study of a man on a suicide mission!  How does he handle the stress of knowing he is about to die?

The United States and the Soviet Union are at war, an air war in which bombers escorted by fighters try to make their way past interceptors and through anti-aircraft fire to deliver nuclear strikes on enemy cities.  The US military has been caught with its pants down because it didn't train enough men in how to arm a nuclear bomb, so civilian technicians have been called for to accompany the bombers on their missions to Russia!  Norman is just such a man, and we follow as he arrives at the air base, meets the bomber crew, boards and flies in the ship, arms the bomb and drops it on the Kremlin, where it explodes, destroying (I hope) the leadership of the USSR and also Norman's own bomber, which he expected all along.  Budrys's focus is on Norman's mind, how he copes with the stress of knowing he has no hope of surviving the mission.  Norman compartmentalizes his mind, focusing on the task at hand and forgetting he is about to die.  He makes snide remarks and speaks in movie quotes.  He follows his training like a robot.  He flips a dime in his pocket and then indulges in the self-consciously dramatic gesture of putting the dime on the bomb so the coin will fall with the bomb.  

The theme of much of Budrys's work is the question of "what is a man?" and here he explores the psychology of the kind of person who can successfully go through with a complex operation while burdened with the knowledge that he and all his fellows will not survive that operation.

"With a Dime on Top of It" is well-written on a sentence by sentence basis, but it doesn't build to a climax or spring a surprise ending on readers or anything like that, because we know from the start that Norman and his fellows are doomed to die.  Maybe we are supposed to be surprised that Norman actually goes through with it, that he doesn't turn out to be a communist spy or suddenly become a peacenik and betray the mission or at the last minute figure out a way to save the bomber or something--maybe the twist ending is that there is no twist ending!

It looks like "With a Dime on Top of It" was never reprinted after its debut in Science Fiction Stories, which is not surprising seeing as it is not conventionally satisfying.      

"To the Wilderness I Wander" by Frank Butler

Marianne, an attractive young married woman and a grad student who teaches English literature, reads detective and science fiction stories, and has crushed her husband's spirit with her sarcasm, is riding the New York City subway one day when the train drives right into another dimension with different subway stations.  She gets out at a cavernous station devoid of life and walks around.  

Butler's text largely concerns itself with the woman's ambiguous and equivocal feelings.  Is she scared or is she not scared?  Does she want to be scared or is she scared of being scared?  A theme of the story seems to be how we can never pin anything down or be certain of anything, that authenticity is a myth--our sense impressions of the outside world and our memories are totally unreliable and our own thoughts and feelings are artificial constructs. 
Again she wondered whether she were mad.  This time it was an idle thought, but still not without appeal.  It would explain a good many things about her and about what seemed to be going on, but now she doubted whether she could ever convince herself of it.
After ten pages on the subway and in the alien subway station Marianne finds a stairway and climbs to the surface to find an empty room, and then steps out into an empty city of crooked streets and buildings reminiscent of 17th-century Europe.  Finally she meets another person, Benjamin, an ugly man who, in keeping with the story's themes, speaks cryptically, often ignores questions, and whenhe does answer professes ignorance.  Marianne's interactions with Benjamin reveal more of her character, and we see that, as with Bretnor's psyker, Butler's student has the sort of character flaws we associate with women:
...being sophisticated...[Marianne] abhorred plainness, abhorred any simplicity of dress or manner that was not calculated to attract covetous men or impress envious women.
Women are shallow, they are fake, and they live emotional lives entirely based on what others think of them--at least according to male authors Bretnor and Butler.

Page after page of boring description and tedious inconclusive dialogue ensues ("To the Wilderness I Wander" is over 25 pages long.)  Benjamin eventually explains that this world is a world of futures, histories, which never occurred, "a place of things that did not quite happen," inhabited by people who, like Marianne and himself, blundered into this world that is "time's refuse heap."  Perhaps Merril liked this boring thing because it serves as a debunking or subversion of traditional SF stories in which characters are transported to Barsoom or Narnia or wherever and get mixed up in wars and with princesses and become heroes--Benjamin tells Marianne that he doesn't really understand this place and has no map to it and sums up "This is not Africa, Marianne, and I have found no romance to tell you and no weapons for us to use."  When Marianne realizes she is stuck here in this empty world forever because she was a selfish fool on Earth she thinks she can change and become a good person as well as Benjamin's lover, but Benjamin assures her that there is no hope, love or sex here in this netherworld:
"There is no love and little emotion here.  There are no men and no women.  There are only lost people."
Long and slow, with tedious and repetitive descriptions and characters who lack personality and motivation and make no real decisions, "To the Wilderness I Wander" is a drag.  Butler's story is "literary" (Marianne quotes "Tom O'Bedlam" again and again, for example), but not in a way that is fun or insightful or challenging--where some "serious literature" is frustrating because it is hard to understand, but offers rewards if you strain your brain to comprehend it, Butler's writing is easy to understand but as you read it you struggle to stay awake having quickly realized that it has nothing interesting or original to say; "To the Wilderness I Wander" is just a bunch of pointless details piled up on top of an obvious plot--selfish jerk ends up in Hell--that doesn't even offer the thrills one might derive if Marianne had committed some exciting sins, like robbing banks and murdering people, and was going to suffer some exciting punishments, like burning in a lake of fire while being scourged by winged reptilian devils.  Marianne is a boring sinner who ends up in a boring hell and it takes her way too many pages to get there.  Thumbs down!  

"To the Wilderness I Wander" debuted in The Hudson Review alongside an example of serious literature that is seriously hard to understand, Ezra Pound's 96th Canto, a long poem full of Greek, Chinese, Latin, and references to history only very few people are going to get--in one stanza of the poem Pound actually flaunts this, writing "If we never write anything save what is already understood, the field of understanding will never be extended.  One demands the right, now and again, to write for a few people with special interests and whose curiosity reaches into greater detail."  I read "To the Wilderness I Wander" in the scan at the internet archive of Martha Foley's Fifty Best American Short Stories.

**********

I think it is fair to say that I didn't like any of these stories as much as Merril did, though I only thought one of them was actually bad.  
         
  

Friday, March 31, 2023

Saul Bellow: "Zetland: By a Character Witness," "Leaving the Yellow House" and "What Kind of Day Did You Have?"

It is time to read some serious mainstream literature!  Let's attack three stories from the middle of the 2001 hardcover edition of Collected Stories by Saul Bellow that I bought at the book sale at the Central Branch of the Public Library of Des Moines many years ago.

"Zetland: By a Character Witness" (1974)

This is a 14-page biography of a sickly Jewish genius, born in the Chicago of the early Twenties, the son of a poor man who moved his way up to become a buyer at a department store.  Zet the genius reads all the hard books and has opinions about all the avant garde artists and is intimately familiar with all the major composers, even as a little kid.  He studies philosophy in college and marries a sexy Macedonian girl whom his father detests and he gets a fellowship at Columbia and they move to New York but there he suffers a recurrence of his childhood illness and loses interest in philosophy, drops out of Columbia and starts hanging out in Greenwich Village.  The story ends without telling us what happens to this guy other than that he wants to join up during World War II and has a son born during the war; it is not even clear if he ever joins the military (seems unlikely--he is quite unhealthy) or ever gets a real job or just lives off his wife's earnings as an office worker--it is made clear that Zet himself is unsuited to office work.  It seems possible he becomes a novelist, as during his illness he becomes smitten by Moby Dick.    

At times the story, which I guess is primarily meant to be a vivid reconstruction of American Jewish life before 1945, seems like a celebration of Jewish intelligence and affinity for the life of the mind, what with how we are told again and again how Zet and his father know all about art, literature and music, and how Zet is fun and kind and generous to everybody, but at the end you have to suspect it is a tragedy--Dad doesn't like the girl his son is so crazy about and Zet is apparently too sick (or maybe too scatterbrained and unfocused?) to really do anything much productive with his superbrain.  There is also the issue of Zet's politics--as a young man he is a commie, but the behavior of the Soviet Union in 1939 seems to disillusion him.  And then there is the title, with its reference to the unobtrusive narrator, who knew Zet when they were teens--is he a "character witness" because during or after the war Zet got in trouble with the law?

The story sort of lacks a climax and resolution, but it is dense with detail.  Some of these details seem to suggest Zet is a romantic poseur, almost a goofball (he relishes living in crappy apartments, for example), and others are surprising, perhaps meant to shock.  Zet's household growing up included two maiden aunts, and we are told they notice a smell like herring coming from Zet's wife--they have never had sex themselves, and assume this smell is a sign of disease, when in fact Bellow tells us it is just the normal smell of a woman who has had sex.

After first appearing in 1974 in the scholarly journal Modern Occasions, "Zetland: By a Character Witness" would be reprinted in the 1984 collection Him With His Foot In His Mouth and Other Stories.

"Leaving the Yellow House" (1958)

I'm not Jewish and I'm not very smart, but I can identify with a guy who likes books and moves to New York City to attend grad school and then disappoints his parent by dropping out and marrying a woman parent does not approve of.  "Leaving the Yellow House" is more challenging for me to inhabit, as it is about an old woman who likes to drink and lives in the desert in the South West.  

Hattie is something of a loser, a septuagenarian divorcee who likes nothing more than to drink booze and smoke cigarettes.  From a middle-class East Coast family, she suffered a severe decline in her fortunes and has had jobs and relationships she found demeaning, and has done things for which she is ashamed, like publicly accusing a neighbor of killing her dog when it was she herself who had to kill the aggressive beast when it attacked her.  Her last job was to be the live-in companion of a more sophisticated woman whom she was supposed to discourage from drinking--Hattie instead became her eager drinking companion.  When this woman died she left Hattie her yellow house with the beautiful view of the lake and mountains.  This story is largely about Hattie's determination to keep this yellow house even as she declines and people keep telling her she should sell it or rent it out and move because she can no longer look after it or herself--this house to her represents her greatest triumph, it being the only thing she has ever really owned, and she does not want to give it up.  Bellow creates tension in the story as he gives us so many reasons to see Hattie as irresponsible, selfish, and a troublemaker, but also a figure of pity who has suffered--can we excuse her foolishness and her disregard for the safety of others because she herself has had a tough time of it?  

"Leaving the Yellow House" was included in Mosby's Memoirs and Other Stories after its initial appearance in an issue of Esquire the cover of which is reminding me of the work of Yayoi Kusama, whose current exhibition at the Hirshhorn my sister dragged me* to a few days ago--that woman loves dots!  (I'm going to level with my fellow philistines and tell you that I thought Kusama's work banal gimmickry and her poem about coronavirus highlighted at the Hirshhorn exhibition like something a child would write; I like this Esquire cover much better--maybe it belongs in the government museum!)

"What Kind of Day Did You Have?" (1984)

Clocking in at some 70 pages, "What Kind of Day Did You Have" is almost three times as long as "Leaving the Yellow House," which I have to admit felt sort of lengthy. This one has a big cast of characters.  The central figure is Katrina Goliger, mother of two little kids.  Her husband Alfred was a jewelry and antiques dealer who travelled around the world all the time and cheated on Katrina, she in turn cheated on him, so now they are divorced and in a custody fight over the kids.  Katrina for over a year has been in an affair with a famous 70-something intellectual, Victor Wulpy, a guy who gives lectures all over the place on modern poetry and painting and philosophy and has written articles about E. E. Cummings (Wulpy capitalizes it), Karl Marx and Paul Valery.  Wulpy has a wife and is a serial adulterer, and Katrina is his favorite mistress, the one who can really get him going, really get his septuagenarian penis erect.  A somewhat mysterious police officer, a Lieutenant Krieggstein, is also courting Katrina.  Krieggstein, as his name perhaps reflects, carries with him at all time three pistols, so is always ready to fight, but he is losing the competition for Katrina, stuck in what the kids call "the friend zone":  Krieggstein is always doing favors for Katrina, like walking her dog and looking after the kids and helping her with the custody fight, but he never makes any progress with Katrina--it is the famous Wulpy who treats her like a sexual plaything whom Katrina desires; nice guy Krieggstein finishes last.  Katrina has a sister, Dorothea, whose husband, head of a plastics company, died, so that now Dorothea is trying to run the business herself; Dorothea is envious of her sister, now that she is having sex with a world class intellectual and meeting famous brainiacs and celebs like Buckminster Fuller, Willem de Kooning and Jackie O.  There's also the black woman who was nanny to Katrina and Dorothea and is now nanny to Katrina's own kids, Ysole, who may or may not be on the side of Katrina's husband in the custody fight.

"What Kind of Day Did You Have?" is about how life, especially the effort to build human relationships, is essentially futile.  It is impossible to make connections with other people; love is always a one-way street, a yearning that will not be requited.  The people who theoretically should love you--your parents, your children, the nanny who actually raised you, the people you have sex with--are opponents you combat or exploiters to whom you submit.  Across the lines of sex and race and age, connections are impossible--Bellow describes many marital relationships, parental relationships, and business relationships in the story, and presents all of them as humiliating and painful. 

The plot.  Wulpy is in Buffalo on his way to Chicago and wants company so he calls up Katrina, who lives in Evanston, Ill., and gets her to meet him at the airport in Buffalo so she can fly with him back to Chi-town.  Katrina loves being with Wulpy so accedes to his request, even though she will miss a court hearing and may be putting her right to custody of her kids (whom she doesn't seem to get along too well with anyway) in jeopardy.  At the airport in the Empire State, Wulpy tells Katrina all about the talk he just gave in Buffalo--set up by his daughter, a student at the college where he spoke, it was on how the insights of Marx's famous The Eighteenth Brumaire can be applied to 1970s America--and a talk he must give tomorrow to some business executives in Chicago.  Then appears an old acquaintance of Wulpy's, Larry Wrangel, an attendee of this Buffalo lecture.  Wrangel was a philosophy student at NYU and a writer for Flash Gordon and Buck Rogers comic books when Wulpy first knew him, now he is a Hollywood director who has made a blockbuster science fiction movie that the characters keep comparing to Star Wars.  (I recall there being SF references in Bellow's Mr. Sammler's Planet and Herzog, which I read years ago.)  These two rich creatives discuss whether an analysis of America that relies on European class categories is of any actual value, and the related idea that Americans create themselves, are deracinated self-made men left adrift, unmoored.  Well, at least I think that is what these guys are talking about:

"Well," said Wrangel, "I have a friend who says that the created souls of people, of the Americans, have been removed.  The created soul has been replaced by an artificial one, so there's nothing real that human beings can refer to when they try to judge any matter for themselves.  They live mainly by rationales.  They have made-up guidance systems." 
Wrangel admires Wulpy, sees him as a great man, even compares him to FDR (whose vast temple I  traversed on Sunday while attending with my sister the cherry blossom festival in the capitol of our empire of artificial-souled rationale followers) but Wulpy treats him shabbily, in part because Wrangel doesn't slavishly follow Wulpy's thinking, but challenges it--he seems to suggest that ideas--to which Wulpy has devoted his life--do not really drive life and history.  Wulpy has gotten rich and famous and has been able to have sex with lots of women because of his facility with ideas, but his work doesn't really matter in the long run.

Wulpy and Katrina catch their flight to Chicago, but snow over the Windy City diverts it to Detroit, where they meet Wrangel again for more wrangling over ideas.  There is a dearth of flights to Chicago.  Will Wulpy miss his speech to the executives?  Will Katrina's lie to her kids and her black nanny about what she is really up to be exposed?  Wulpy contacts the executives, and they send a private jet to pick him and Katrina up and bring them to Chicago.  As they wait in a Detroit hotel room, Katrina calls the nanny, who accuses her of lying about where she is, and humiliates her by saying she always lied as a child, leading Katrina to reflect that black people hate white people:
They hate us, said Trina to herself, after Ysole had hung up.  They hate us terribly.
and on what it is she admires about Wulpy:
Katrina again felt: Everybody has power over me.  Alfred, punishing me, the judge, the lawyers, the psychiatrist, Dotey--even the kids.  They all apply standards nobody has any use for, except to stick you with.  That's what drew me to Victor, that he wouldn't let anybody set conditions for him. Let others make the concessions.  That's how I'd like to be.  Except that I haven't got his kind of ego, which is a whole mountain of ego.  Now it's Ysole's turn.     
(No doubt feminists, Marxists, BLM activists and every other species of liberal or leftist could write reams about this scene in which a duplicitous white middle-class woman who hobnobs with celebrities whines that her "Negro" servant has power over her!)   

In the hotel room Katrina and Wulpy have sex, and Katrina indulges in memories of earlier pivotal moments in the history of their relationship, providing insight into how Wulpy manipulates her as well as his wife, and suggesting that he doesn't really love either of them, though Katrina speculates that perhaps he manipulates her for (his conception of) her own good.  For example, Wulpy insisted Katrina read Celine's Journey to the End of the Night, a book that she interprets as debunking the very idea of love--is this just callousness, or some kind of test, or an effort by Wulpy, who is much older than Katrina and nearly died a year ago, to prepare Katrina to accept Wulpy's death?--the solipsistic Wulpy may not love Katrina, but he can easily believe that his own death will break her heart.  

The private plane picks Katrina and Wulpy up, and, caught in severe turbulence, they fear they will crash and die.  Katrina tries to get Wulpy to tell her he loves her, and he dismissively refuses.  Back in Chicago, Katrina is reunited with her kids and with Krieggstein, who has been using his resources to help her in her custody fight.  Her overtures to the kids are rebuffed--her own children ignore her--and it looks like despite his efforts on her behalf Krieggstein's love for Katrina is going to remain unrequited for the foreseeable future.       

"What Kind of Day Did You Have" is a dense story, with lots of stuff going on, but there are so many striking little details and so little fat and no tedious repetition that it doesn't feel slow or long; Bellow also doesn't actually tell you what you are expected to think about the characters or their actions, he just throws a bunch of evidence at you and lets you make up your own mind, which keeps you engaged.

Among the odd details, we have, as in "Zetland," a surprising reference to female sexual smells ("the woman-slime odor--that swamp-smell") and in response I came up with a theory that Bellows says this sort of stuff because he is trying to be the kind of audacious mountain of ego who ignores social conventions and refuses to make concessions that he portrays Victor Wulpy as.  

An interesting piece of symbolism comes in the form of a violin.  Wulpy's daughter in Buffalo hands her expensive violin (which Wulpy bought her and the resale value of which he monitors as if he really thinks of it as an investment) to him to take to Chicago to have worked upon by experts.  Wulpy, as a rhetorician, promotes art, argues that one of America's problems is we don't take art seriously, that asserts that art should be treated as something as vital as oxygen and food, and by carrying around this valuable violin he is physically embodying the role of protector of fine art.  All of Bellow's mentions of how Wulpy (and then Katrina) are carrying it and where they are putting it add suspense to the story, as the reader expects it to get crushed or lost at any moment.

The references to popular culture in the story are amusing, in particular how Katrina caused a crisis in her relationship with Victor by dragging him to see the film M*A*S*H*, which she had already seen and felt deserved a strong recommendation; he detested the movie and lost respect for her taste.  Katrina, after reflecting that her own children are alien to her, suggests that Victor told her that "Star Wars flicks corrupted everybody, implanted mistrust of your own flesh and blood."  I thought this was wild, in part because early in the week my sister dragged me* to a loud, garish and horrendous Smithsonian exhibit celebrating how TV, cinema and sports advanced diversity and other au currant values and the opinion the government museum espoused about Star Wars was that it renewed America's spirit after the USA had made the humiliating blunder of opposing communism in South East Asia.    

It seems a version of "What Kind of Day Did You Have?" appeared in Vanity Fair on the cover of which Bellow's tale was promoted as "an extraordinary love story" inside a heart scrawled by Keith Haring (having slagged the work of Yayoi Kusama as childish and gimmicky, you can perhaps guess how I feel about Haring's work.)

*So you don't think this was a totally one-sided phenomenon, I'll own that I dragged my sister to the Smithsonian American Art Museum and the National Gallery of Art to see sculptures by Paul Manship and Augustus Saint-Gaudens and paintings by Abbot Handerson Thayer.  

**********

These are good stories, "What Kind of Day Did You Have?" probably the best, as it has so many economically interwoven characters and themes, though "Zetland: By a Character Witness" is probably my fave because it builds a vivid portrait of a past world in which I am interested and offers plenty of sharp images.  

It is undeniably worthwhile to spend a week reading "real" 20th-century American literature and marching hither and thither through Washington, D.C. attending festivals and visiting monuments and bookstores and museums and eating for lunch braised lamb at Cava three out of four days, but I am looking forward to hunkering down in MPorcius Fiction Log's rural HQ next week and getting back to my usual diet of SF stories and inexpensive groceries.  See you soon!